How we are hungry

First off I must say that I am a huge Roger Federer’s fan. I love Roger so much not only because is the best that ever played the game, but also because is a good guy, simple, polite, wise, honest and upright. He’s the most talented to ever play this sport but he’s humble in a staggering way. That said, his game is so good that makes me hungry for his next match. But I would say more: there’s no sign of laziness or sloopyness in his approach to the game. He’s still hungry to win, play, compete and talk about the game. Grand Slam # 9, Roger has won 8 of the last 12 Grand Slams and seems never tired of showing his greatness.
Relating to the last US Open final, he was too good again: 69 winners to 19 Ues. What sick numbers! A Rod coped with his aggressive groundstrokes for a while. We have to give him that. Andy played really well 2nd and 3rd set, mixing up his game and displaying the best of the quality of his game. Took a set off Fed and forced him to rise up to his proper grade AAA level . Credits to Andy for that. For the record, Roger won 43% of receiving points and allowed Andy only 7 aces. I think no one else is able to do that. This final I think Roger’s biggest weapon was by far his awesome backhand. That was sometimes just unplayable.
In the end, a supposedly funny thing: someone might say that if Roger had won that close 2005 Aussie Open final (against Marat) and Rafa did not exist, Roger would have probably won 10 slam in a row!

P.S.: how cool was it with Tiger Woods in Roger’s corner ? What did they talk about this time?