Davydenko, Ljubicic and Blake: the working class moves into struggle for a spot in the Tennis Masters Cup.

Shanghai is closer for the players who won the three ATP tournaments of the past week. Davydenko (Kremlin Cup winner), Ljubicic (BA-CA tennis trophy back to back winner) and Blake (Stockholm Open back to back winner) moved a step closer to the Masters Cup field. More than someone is saying that those players are not very talented and deserve a spot in Masters Cup just because of their hard work.
Talent is what eggheads and writers from time immemorial have been talking about. But what is the talent? That’s a million dollar question. Talent means a natural endowment, an innate ability of a superior quality. Talent is something extraordinary. And works from talented guys are always stunning. But how do you measure the talent of a player? Is talent alone enough to succeed in high level sports? So many questions today and no answers. Almost anyone who loves tennis knows that nowadays there's just one player who has a brilliant, amazing, glaring, undeniable talent and that's Roger Federer. As you watch him play sometimes you ask yourself how it is possible to do what you just saw him do.
But, you know, apart from Federer, all the top players are more or less skilled, hard workers and fit. So, on what basis con you classify their talent? Does it make sense? So many questions, definitely!